Skip to content

dpdk: update to 25.11.3 - #62146

Merged
Duncaen merged 1 commit into
void-linux:masterfrom
eholzbach:dpdk
Sep 10, 2026
Merged

dpdk: update to 25.11.3#62146
Duncaen merged 1 commit into
void-linux:masterfrom
eholzbach:dpdk

Conversation

@eholzbach

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Testing the changes

  • I tested the changes in this PR: YES

Local build testing

  • I built this PR locally for my native architecture, X86_64-glibc

@eholzbach
eholzbach force-pushed the dpdk branch 4 times, most recently from 8ff26e0 to 3ce15ba Compare August 22, 2026 20:05
@eholzbach
eholzbach marked this pull request as ready for review August 23, 2026 13:41
Comment thread srcpkgs/dpdk/template Outdated
Comment thread srcpkgs/dpdk/template Outdated
@eholzbach
eholzbach requested a review from Duncaen September 10, 2026 22:00
@Duncaen
Duncaen merged commit 95dc131 into void-linux:master Sep 10, 2026
8 checks passed
Comment thread srcpkgs/dpdk/template
aarch64*) configure_args+=" -Dmachine=armv8-a";;
ppc64le*) configure_args+=" -Dmachine=power8";;
*) configure_args+=" -Dmachine=default"
armv7l*) _cpu_instruction_set=armv8-a; _dpdk_platform=generic_aarch32;;

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

wait this doesn't look correct, why make armv7 armv8?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Facepalm. Want to revert or should I open a pr to fix?

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wait, from what I recall this was intentional. Sifting back through their docs.

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@Duncaen Duncaen Sep 10, 2026

Copy link
Copy Markdown
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

PR is easier, revert requires an additional rebuild and changes for "reverts=" etc.

I guess we could either disable armv7l or keep it as it is in case someone runs (void) armv7l on aarch32 hardware. Disabling would probably simplify the template. Doesn't matter to me, if it won't work on actual armv7l anyways.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants